Lincoln buffs are naturally meticulous about facts, and the excerpt from Twenty Days, the new book about Lincoln’s assassination by Dorothy Meserve Kunhardt and Philip B. Kunhardt, in our April issue, stirred up some controversy. We heard from several readers on two questions in particular: whether John Wilkes Booth really did bore the peephole in the door to Lincoln’s box at Ford’s Theatre; and whether Stanton really did say (as the Kunhardts reported it) “He belongs to the angels now,” rather than “Now he belongs to the ages,” at the moment of Lincoln’s death.
On the first of these intriguing queries, it has been brought to our attention that Mr. Frank Ford, the son of Harry Clay Ford, treasurer of Ford’s Theatre, is still very much alive, and that he vehemently disputes the statement by the Kunhardts that Booth, on the day of the assassination, “bored a peephole in the door to the box itself. …” In 1962 Mr. Ford wrote a letter to Dr. George J. Olszewski, official historian of Ford’s Theatre, including these remarks:
”… I say again and unequivocally that John Wilkes Booth did not bore the hole in the door leading to the box President Lincoln occupied the night of his assassination. … The hole was bored by my father, Harry Clay Ford, or rather on his orders, and was bored for the very simple reason it would allow the guard, one Parker, easy opportunity whenever he so desired to look into the box rather than to open the inner door to check on the presidential party. … My father would always ‘blow his top,’ to use today’s slang, whenever he read or heard of this historical absurdity … and would often finish his vehemence by saying, ‘John Booth had too much to do that day other than to go around boring holes in theatre doors.’ ”
Mrs. Kunhardt points out that this is in contradiction to what Harry Clay Ford said, under oath, at the trial of the conspirators in May, 1865. From the trial transcript she quotes these words of Ford’s: “I know nothing of the mortise in the wall [supposedly made by Booth to facilitate barring the door leading to the box] … nor did I see the hole bored through the door of the President’s box, though I have since heard there was one.” To this Mr. Frank Ford replied, in a conversation with an AMERICAN HERITAGE editor, “I can only tell you that my father was understandably frightened when he gave that testimony.” He explained that his father was anxious to be cleared of any suspicion of having collaborated with Booth and, in the oppressive atmosphere of the conspiracy trials, felt the best way out was to say he knew nothing of the peephole.
“Now he belongs to the ages” is the version of Stanton’s words given by most biographers and perpetuated in stone at the Lincoln Tomb in Springfield, Illinois. However, since Stanton was sobbing when he said whatever he did say, it seems quite possible that the key word may have been “angels” instead of “ages”; that, at any rate, is the way Corporal James Tanner (whom the Kunhardts quote in their book) heard it. It is tantalizing to speculate that Stanton may in fact have said “angels,” then heard himself quoted as saying “ages,” decided that that had a more noble ring to it, and let it stand.
A Stickney by Any Other Name
After reading “A Brief Note for Expectant Parents” in our February, 1965, issue—about unusual names given to infants in nineteenth-century Connecticut—Charles R. Schultz, Librarian at Mystic Seaport in that state, sent us the following item from the Charleston, South Carolina, Daily Courier of October 31, 1856:
“We heard of a family in Detroit, whose sons were named One Stickney, Two Stickney, Three Stickney, and whose daughters were named First Stickney, Second Stickney, and so on. The three elder children of another family were named Joseph, And, and Another, and it has been supposed that should they have [had] any more, they might have named them Also, Moreover, Nevertheless, and Notwithstanding. Another family actually named their child Finis, supposing it was their last, but they happened afterward to have a daughter and two sons, whom they called Addenda, Appendix, and Supplement. Another parent set out to perpetuate the names of the Gospels, and named the fifth child Acts. A man in Pennsylvania called his second son James Also, and the third William Likewise.”
Two Civil Wars
Amidst a flurry of angry missives attacking this magazine and author Walter Lord for alleged anti-southern prejudice in “Mississippi: The Past That Has Not Died,” in our June issue, there was one from the Honorable Tullius Brady, of the Mississippi House of Representatives. Says he: “The rest of this country will never bring one [white Mississippian] back into the Union. I want no part of it—socialism and egalitarianism are not for me.” We also received recently a charming note from Sir George Bull, Bart., of London, England. “When I was in Williamsburg, Virginia,” Sir George says, “I pulled the leg of the young lady in charge of the Historical Information Office by asking her on which side was Virginia in the Civil War. She rose beautifully, and in a delightful southern accent replied, ‘How can you ask, suh? Virginia was the heart and soul of the Confederacy!’ I apologized for the misunderstanding and explained that I meant our Civil War-that of 1642-48. This left her speechless—no one had ever asked her that.”
