American Heritage MagazineOctober 1992    Volume 43, Issue 6

 
1792 Two Hundred Years Ago
1600 Pennsylvania

On October 13 a cornerstone was laid for the Chief Executive’s residence, or “President’s Palace” as Pierre Charles L’Enfant and others referred to it in the unresolved language of the young republic. Throughout its lifetime the building would also be called the Executive Mansion, the President’s House, and the White House. Pennsylvania Avenue was still a cornfield when construction began on the plot above Goose Creek.

James Hoban, the building’s architect, was a young Irishman who had come to the United States after the Revolution and offered his services in a Philadelphia paper to “any Gentleman Who wishes to build in an elegant style.” He designed South Carolina’s state capitol in 1791 before meeting George Washington and entering the competition to design the President’s House in the new federal city by the Potomac. In June 1792 he won a competition that included an anonymous entry by Thomas Jefferson. The Secretary of State’s drawing called for a slightly smaller, domed Italian structure that would have fitted nicely into Monticello or Jefferson’s University of Virginia. Hoban instead conceived a big, three-story rectangular mansion like the Duke of Leinster’s back in Ireland. Hoban was awarded five hundred dollars in gold for his design.

Congress had authorized a federal city along the Potomac “not exceeding ten miles square” in its Residence Bill of July 1790. The President’s House was the first public building to go up in the new capital. George Washington did not serve long enough to move in. The third President, Thomas Jefferson, perhaps spoke as a jilted architect when he pronounced his presidential quarters “big enough for two emperors, one Pope, and the Grand Lama.”


 
1892 One Hundred Years Ago
Dumb Day in Coffeyville

The Dalton gang was flush from their successful hit on a railroad at Pryor Creek, Oklahoma—seventeen thousand dollars for just ten minutes’ shooting- when they planned the foolhardy robbery they hoped would secure their notoriety. On the morning of October 5 the Daltons arrived in the town of Coffeyville, Kansas, intent on cleaning out two banks simultaneously, which neither their famous cousins the Youngers nor even the James brothers had ever done. If it came off, one member explained, the double robbery would make the Daltons “outshine Jesse James” himself, since even he “never tried this!”

The editor of the Coffeyville Journal, David Stewart Elliott, was among the first to spot the Daltons when they entered the town “about fifteen minutes before ten o’clock, when the most remarkable occurrence that has ever taken place in the history of our country came upon the peaceful city like a flash of lightning from a clear sky.” Elliott and others easily recognized the outlaws, despite the false goatees and mustaches, for the simple reason that the Dalton brothers had grown up in and around Coffeyville. Almost as soon as the gang divided and entered both the First National and Condon & Co. banks, their fellow citizens were arming themselves at the local hardware store.

A clerk in Condon & Co. managed to shout out, “The bank is being robbed!” while someone across the street looking into the First National saw guns drawn there too. The call to arms went around the plaza. “The volunteer defenders of law were not impelled by a sentiment; they were inspired by a high sense of duty to their neighbors and the community,” wrote Elliott. It was also their money in the banks.

Charles T. Gump had been “driving his team on the street at the time,” Elliott wrote, when, at the alarm, he “sprang from his wagon . . . ran into !sham’s [hardware] store, seized a double-barreled shotgun,” and took up his position outside First National. Bob Dalton’s first shot hit Gump’s hand, and his “gun fell in several pieces at his feet.” After the men in Rammel’s drugstore began firing into the front of the First National, Bob and Emmet Dalton left by a back way carrying twenty thousand dollars. In the alley they surprised and killed a young clerk named Lucius M. Baldwin.

At Condon & Co., however, the other three members—Gratton Dalton, Bill Powers, and Dick Broadwell—were stalled by the bank clerk through a series of ingenious evasions. The robbers were still bickering with the clerk when citizens began shooting through the heavy glass windows with borrowed Winchesters and shotguns. There was no back door through which to escape, and when the thieves came out onto the street, reported Elliott with satisfaction, “Grat Dalton and Bill Powers each received mortal wounds before they had retreated twenty steps. The dust was seen to fly from their clothes, and Powers in his desperation attempted to take refuge in the rear doorway of an adjoining store, but the door was locked . . .” He ran toward his horse and “fell dead at the feet of the animal that had carried him.” Grat lived long enough to kill the town marshal, then was dropped a second time by the marksmen inside !sham’s. Emmet was wounded mounting his horse but hung on to the money bag, then rode back for his dying brother Bob. As he leaned down toward his brother, one Carey Seaman—who had shot Broadwell as he tried to ride off—gave Emmet both barrels in the back. The fight lasted just twelve minutes.

Emmet Dalton, surprisingly, was saved by the town surgeon and served fourteen years in the Kansas State Penitentiary and then was pardoned. He married and went into business in California. In 1931 he returned to Coffeyville to reminisce with the shaky old heroes of that long-ago day. He died a few years later in Los Angeles.


 
1917 Seventy-Five Years Ago
How Long Must Women Wait?

On October 20 the suffragist leader Alice Paul was arrested at her station outside the White House, where she had been leading pickets against President Wilson’s resistance to the Nineteenth Amendment since January. After the President had grown tired of meeting with suffragist delegations, Alice Paul and Lucy Burns and their newly formed Congressional Union, an offshoot of the National Woman’s party, had taken up positions outside the White House, six at the west gate and six at the east, some holding signs that read HOW LONG MUST WOMEN WAIT FOR LIBERTY? The women kept watch six days a week, from 10:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M. At first it was amicable. “Every day when [the President] went out for his daily ride,” recalled Paul, “as he drove through our picket line he always took off his hat and bowed to us. We respected him very much.” On the day of Wilson’s second inauguration, one thousand women braved a whipping rainstorm to encircle the White House.

After America’s entry into the war the preceding April, tolerance waned for such displays. “The feeling was,” said Paul, “that the cause of suffrage should be abandoned during wartime, that we should work instead for peace. But this was the same argument used during the Civil War, after which they wrote the word ‘male’ into the Constitution.” By June the suffragists had become a target for mobs who attacked them as pro-German, ripped their signs, spat at or jostled them, and worse. On June 22, after months as amused onlookers, the police began making daily arrests of the suffragists, who refused to pay their fines and were jailed in a place where, one of the women later recalled, “in the night, prisoners could actually hear the light cell-chairs being removed, so big and strong were the rats.”

Despite their cell conditions the women on the pickets returned again and again to jail. On October 20 Alice Paul was sentenced to seven months and was moved quickly into solitary confinement. There she announced a hunger strike protesting the fact that her comrades weren’t considered political prisoners. After about three weeks she was force-fed through her nose. Then, as mysteriously as the arrests had begun, the women were all released at the end of November.

Wilson at last came out in favor of the suffrage amendment in January of 1918—perhaps worn down not only by the Congressional Union for Woman’s Suffrage but also by his daughters, both adamant for the vote. But he did little to campaign for the amendment on Capitol Hill, and, although it cleared the House, the legislation came up two votes short in the Senate in June 1918. The Woman’s party took up their pickets again, and the D.C. police escorted them routinely back to jail.

The suffrage amendment passed in the spring of 1919, in time for women to vote in the next year’s election.


 
1942 Fifty Years Ago
On the Home Front

Proving perhaps that the wartime soberness had affected truly everyone, collars were shorter and less luxurious on this year’s fur coats, which cost from $185 to $500 at Bergdorf Goodman’s. Esquire magazine—the guardian of male taste—noted that the cuff was disappearing from men’s trousers. More seriously, the magazine explained in its predictions for the coming year just how much the fight against Hitler would cost the average breadwinner: “Speaking very roughly your tax bill for 1942 will be twice what you paid last year.” The single man pulling down $3,000 per year would pay $450 in taxes, up from $225 in 1941. For the married man who made $10,000 and, as the Esquire editors put it, had “not yet been visited by the stork,” his tax share of the war effort might approach $2,100.

In movie houses Bette Davis was starring in Now, Voyager, casting off her spectacles and stern upbringing in the name of hopeless love; as one reviewer put it, she “stirs up trouble for no one but her mother.” The Glass Key, based on the novel by Dashiell Hammett, premiered. It featured an unflappable Alan Ladd exchanging deadpan glances with the equally cool Veronica Lake but in the end proving more loyal to his ward boss.

On Broadway William Saroyan’s Hello Out There opened at the Belasco, while Noel Coward’s Blithe Spirit played at the Booth; Life with Father (with Louis Calhern and Dorothy Gish) booked the Empire; My Sister Eileen, based on Ruth McKenney’s New Yorker magazine stories (and later itself the basis for the musical Wonderful Town) was at the Martin Beck; Strip for Action, by Howard Lindsay and R’fcssel Grouse, about a burlesque troupe and an army camp, occupied the National. The Forty-sixth Street Theatre had New Priorities of 1943, which one critic described as “a vaudeville show that must be classed as mediocre, even though it includes Harry Richman, Bert Wheeler, Carol Bruce, and all those wonderful dogs.” At the Ambassador it was Wine, Women and Song, starring the pantomimist Jimmy Savo.

The week of October 12-18 was many things to many people: J. Walter Thompson Company and the Laymen’s National Committee respectively lobbied to have it named National Wine Week and National Bible Week. “Hallelujah! Bottoms up!” saluted The New Yorker.


 
1967 Twenty-Five Years Ago
Pentagon Protest

On October 21 and 22 between 50,000 and 150,000 protesters invaded Washington, D.C., for the March on the Pentagon but found the building strongly guarded. The police made 647 arrests during the two days. Antiwar protests also took place in four other cities, including Oakland, California, where Joan Baez was among a hundred people arrested outside an Army induction office. The events provoked a major policy speech from President Johnson one week later, in which he pledged unwavering support for the American effort in Vietnam.

Despite the heroics of left fielder Carl Yastrzemski, who had almost single-handedly won the Boston Red Sox their first pennant since 1946, the team succumbed to the St. Louis Cardinals after seven spirited games in the World Series.


 
More Fun than Freud

Dr. Robert Ravich’s Interpersonal Behavior Game-Test—a diagnostic tool for married couples in which they raced a pair of electric trains against a clock, cooperating or not cooperating at their own risk—was the season’s splashiest innovation in psychology. Already, more than one hundred couples had played out their relationship with the toy trains in Dr. Ravich’s New York office. Each spouse operated a train against a time limit for completing the course. Husband and wife were kept from seeing each other’s engine by a dividing wall, but their trains could collide if they did not accommodate each other at crucial points, granting the doctor insight into how they might cooperate outside his office. Women who started the Game-Test submissively were sometimes daring engineers by the end, sending their trains straight through instead of switching tracks in favor of their husbands. Although Ravich claimed many of the couples learned compromise and teamwork from playing his game, the real purpose was to quickly establish patterns for later discussion. Dr. Ravich’s game was a variation on the bargaining theory of Columbia University’s Dr. Morton Deutsch, who had been inspired while watching two Italian bus drivers engage in a loud test of wills at an intersection.