American Heritage MagazineApril/May 2003    Volume 54, Issue 2
History Now
 

Harry Truman and the Price of Victory

New Llght on the President’s Biggest Decision

What did President Harry S. Truman and his senior advisers believe an invasion of Japan would cost in American dead? Is In recent years this has been a matter of heated historical controversy, with Truman’s critics maintaining that the huge casualty estimates he later cited were a “postwar creation” designed to justify his use of nuclear weapons against a beaten nation already on the verge of suing for peace. The real reasons, they maintain, range from a desire to intimidate the Russians to sheer bloodlust. One historian wrote in the New York Times, “No scholar of the war has ever found archival evidence to substantiate claims that Truman expected anything close to a million casualties, or even that such large numbers were conceivable.” Another skeptic insisted on the total absence of “any high-level supporting archival documents from the Truman administration in the months before Hiroshima that, in unalloyed form, provides even an explicit estimate of 500,000 casualties, let alone a million or more.”

A series of documents recently discovered at the Harry S. Truman Presidential Library & Museum in Independence, Missouri, and described by this author in an article in the March 2003 Pacific Historical Review, tells a different story.

In the midst of the bloody fighting on Okinawa, which began in April 1945, President Truman received a warning that the invasion could cost as many as 500,000 to 1,000,000 American lives. The document containing this estimate, “Memorandum on Ending the Japanese War,” was one of a series of papers written by former President Herbert Hoover at Truman’s request in May 1945.

The Hoover memorandum is well known to students of the era, hut they have generally assumed that Truman solicited it purely as a courtesy to Hoover and Secretary of War Henry Stimson, who had been Hoover’s Secretary of State. As it turns out, however, Truman had a much higher opinion of Hoover than do today’s historians.

“What we now know,” says Robert Ferrell, the editor of Truman’s private papers, “is that Truman seized upon this memo and sent memoranda to his senior advisers asking for written judgments from each.” Moreover, adds Ferrell, this discovery “not merely shows that Truman knew about such a high casualty figure” far in advance of the decision to use atom bombs but that he “was exercised about the half-million figure—no doubt about that.” Yet another discovery, by the Hoover Presidential Library’s former senior archivist, Dwight Miller, indicates that the estimate likely originated during Hoover’s regular briefings by Pentagon intelligence officers.

Truman forwarded the memorandum to the director of the Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion, Fred M. Vinson, on June 4. Vinson had no quarrel with the casualty estimate when he responded three days later. He returned the original memo along with one of his own, suggesting that Hoover’s paper be shown to Stimson, Acting Secretary of State Joseph C. Grew, and former Secretary of State Cordell Hull. Truman sent copies of the memo to all three men, asking each for a written analysis of it and summoning Grew and Stimson to a meeting to discuss their analysis with him.

Grew immediately forwarded the memo to Judge Samuel L. Rosenman, a longtime adviser and speechwriter for FDR who was then serving as Truman’s special counsel. Stimson, meanwhile, passed on his copy to the Army’s deputy chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Thomas J. Handy, because he wanted to get “the reaction of the [Army] Staff to it,” and he mentioned in his diary that he “had a talk both with Handy and with Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall on the subject.”

Hull was first to respond. Although branding the memo an “appeasement proposal” because it suggested that the Japanese be offered lenient terms to entice them to a negotiating table, he did not take issue with the casualty estimate. Grew, in his reply to the memo, confirmed that the Japanese “are prepared for prolonged resistance,” adding that “prolongation of the war [will] cost a large number of human lives.”

Stimson wrote: “We shall in my opinion have to go through a more bitter finish fight than in Germany….” Truman also met with Adm. William Leahy on the matter. In addition to serving as the President’s White House chief of staff, the admiral was his personal representative on the Joint Chiefs of Staff and acted as unofficial chairman at their meetings. Leahy sent a memorandum stamped URGENT to the other JCS members, as well as to Stimson and Secretary of the Navy James Horrestal, saying that the President wanted a meeting the following Monday afternoon, June 18, to discuss “the losses in dead and wounded that will result from an invasion of Japan proper,” and he stated unequivocally: “It is his intention to make his decision on the campaign with the purpose of economizing to the maximum extent possible in the loss of American lives.”

At the Monday meeting all the participants agreed that an invasion of the home islands would he extremely costly—but that it was essential for the defeat of Imperial Japan. Stimson said he “agreed with the plan proposed by the point Chiefs of Staff as being the best thing to do, hut he still hoped for some fruitful accomplishment through other means.” Those other means ranged from increased political pressure brought to bear through a display of Allied unanimity at the imminent Potsdam Conference to the as-yet-untested atomic weapons that might “shock” the Japanese into surrender.

As for Truman, he said at the meeting that he “was clear on the situation now and was quite sure that the Joint Chiefs of Staff should proceed” but expressed the hope “that there was a possibility of preventing an Okinawa from one end of Japan to the other.”

—D. M. Giangreco


 

Why Do We Say That?

“Horse Swapping”

One of the most common American proverbs, “Never swap horses in midstream,” is indelibly associated with Abraham Lincoln. The observation is a distillation of more extended remarks that Lincoln made on June 9, 1864, to a delegation from the National Union League who had come to the White House to congratulate him on his nomination for a second term as President. What Lincoln said was: “I do not allow myself to suppose that either the convention or the League have concluded to decide that I am either the greatest or best man in America, but rather they have concluded that it is not best to swap horses while crossing the river, and have further concluded that I am not so poor a horse that they might not make a botch of it in trying to swap.”

This bit of folk wisdom seems to have arisen as the punch line of a joke that was told in the 1840s about an Irishman (in other versions a Dutchman, probably meaning a German). Whatever his background, the poor fellow was crossing a stream on a mare, with a colt in tow. Falling off the mare, he grabbed the colt’s tail as it swam toward the bank. Onlookers yelled that he should take the mare’s tail instead as she was the stronger swimmer. But the man held fast to the colt, shouting in reply that this was not a good time for him to change horses.

Lincoln’s elevation of the old joke into a metaphor quickly caught on. Harper’s Weekly ran a political cartoon based on the idea in its issue dated November 12, which came out as Lincoln was about to defeat George B. McClellan at the polls.

The image has endured: Democrats used “Don’t swap horses in the middle of the stream” during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s re-election campaigns of 1940 and 1944. Earlier, in 1932, when FDR first ran for President and the nation’s economy was in shambles, wags suggested that the Republican motto must be “Don’t swap barrels while going over Niagara.” The metaphor has even crossed the Atlantic. Arnold Toynbee wrote in Civilization on Trial, “‘Herodianism’ … is a form of swapping horses while crossing a stream, and the rider who fails to find his seat in the new saddle is swept … to a death.”

It is thanks to Lincoln’s imprimatur that the phrase has become a permanent part of our lexicon.

—Hugh Rawson


 

“An Hour of Pretty Music”

Walter Lord’s Other Life

When Walter Lord died Last May, the newspapers saluted his huge influence as a historian: all those books that vividly reconstructed events like the fall of the Alamo (A Time to Stand), the bombing of Pearl Harbor (Day of Infamy), and the sinking of the Titanic (A Night to Remember). But history wasn’t his first love.

As a young boy in Baltimore in the late 1920s, Walter began buying Bing Crosby’s records, and forever after he was hooked on American popular song. His New York apartment was cluttered with sheet music and with shelves of 78-rpm records of show tunes, movie songs, popular standards, and big-band numbers. He knew them all; I often played for him and other addicts who wanted to sing them around a piano.

Another thing nobody knew was that Walter wrote one lyric—for an international hit song that nobody knew had a lyric. It was “The Third Man Theme,” the zither-plucked melody by Anton Karas that runs through the movie starring Orson Welles as a black-market rogue in postwar Vienna. Walter got the job, he told me, because he happened to know a lawyer who worked with David O. Selznick, the film’s producer.

“Karas’s melody was very catchy and contagious, and Selznick’s people decided it would sell 200,000 more copies if it had words…. I was the only person who knew what Selznick wanted: that whoever wrote the lyric, it had to have zither in the first line. That’s how I won out over all those other lyrics that were probably infinitely better. Somebody like Yip Harburg wrote a lovely lyric, which I later saw, that was all about autumn leaves. Selznick didn’t want autumn leaves. He wanted a zither.”

When a zither starts to play,
You’ll remember yesterday …

That’s how the lyric begins, and it goes on for 64 bars, perhaps the most meandering lyric since “Begin the Beguine.” “I still get royalties from ASCAP every year,” Walter told me, “for any recorded evidence that ’The Third Man Theme’ was played, with or without the lyrics.”

One night in 1988 1 got a letter from Walter that said he was in a hospital, about to have a serious operation. “The doctors seem optimistic,” he wrote, “but they are also a little ‘iffy,’ leading me to think of various contingencies. To begin with, I wouldn’t want any funeral. But I wouldn’t mind a memorial service featuring the kind of music I’ve enjoyed so much—just an hour of pretty music in the 1930s–50s fashion…. The perfect place would be a small room in the Princeton Club, around noon, perhaps in the period around my birthday, October 8.”

I was very upset by the letter but also very moved that on the night before he thought he might die, what was most important to him was this body of American songs that had been part of his life since he was a boy. As it turned out, he lived another 13 years. But I kept the letter and continued to regard it as his final wish, and last October, in a room at the Princeton Club, around noon, his friends and I gave him the good-bye he wanted.

— William Zinsser


 

Editors’ Bookshelf


Writers of books about the history of Indians face many obstacles in making their work readable. To do the job properly, you have to mention the Laurentide ice sheet, radiocarbon dating, mitochondrial DNA, Spider Grandmother, and Star Woman, as well as scores of indigenous words like sipapuni—and that’s just in the first chapter. This is the challenge that Jake Page bravely takes on with In the Hands of the Great Spirit: The 20,000-Year History of American Indians (Free Press, $30, 480 pages). Don’t let the title fool you; Page’s book is clear-eyed and refreshingly nonpreachy, and he does not assume that his readers have acquired their views about Indians from 1950s Westerns. This lack of handwringing makes his book all the more affecting when he reaches the post-Columbian era and coolly describes the European settlers’ many cruelties.

In 1842 Capt. Alexander Slidell Mackenzie of the U.S. Navy brig Somers uncovered plans for a mutiny, and when locking the ringleaders in irons did not seem to extinguish the plot, he ordered three of them hanged without trial. What made the episode particularly lurid was that the senior member of the hanged trio, Midshipman Philip Spencer, was the son of the Secretary of War. The ensuing court-martial stirred bitter controversy and led to the establishment of the Naval Academy. Buckner F. Melton, Jr., a historian and law professor, examines the case in great detail in A Hanging Offense: The Strange Affair of the Warship Somers (Free Press, 320 pages, $25). His intricately researched descriptions of shipboard life in the 1840s paint an engrossing picture of the men involved in the abortive mutiny and the terrible consequences that ensued for all concerned.


 

Rock City Revival

A Hotel Chain is Helping America Restore its Roadside Landmarks

A few years ago the Hampton Inn chain of roadside hotels sponsored a survey that revealed that people vacationing by car are intrigued by the historical oddities they find along the highways. This led to the company’s Save-a-Landmark program, which seeks out places that need, according to a company press release, “minor repairs, a good coat of paint, or even a detailed cleaning.” Having noticed our article “See Rock City” in the April 2000 issue, the folks at Hampton Inn thought we’d like to know about the project’s second beneficiary. They sent us this picture, showing hotel employees and residents of Sevierville, Tennessee, sprucing up the 1940s Willie Chancy Barn, a local treasure on Route 411. With its multiplicity of highways, this country offers hundreds of thousands of such challenges, and Hampton Inn has taken on many, including the Rain of Arrows in Mancos, Colorado, which dates from 1959; the 20-foot-tall Big Duck, a 1931 Long Island landmark (once a restaurant, now a gift shop) in Flanders, New York, which received a newly painted coat and beak; and a 70-year-old Standard Oil gas station on the former Route 66 in Odell, Illinois. Hampton Inn wants to hear from residents and travelers across the country about future candidates. Contact them by mail at Explore the Highway with Hampton, c/o DCW, 8730 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90069 or via their Web site at www.hamptoninn.com.


 

On Exhibit


Celtic cavalry fought against Caesar’s invasion of the British Isles in 55 B.C., and cavalry helped carry the day for William the Conqueror at Hastings in 1066. But those are recent events in light of the earliest artifact to be shown at All the Queen’s Horses: The Role of the Horse in British History at the Kentucky Horse Park’s International Museum of the Horse, in Lexington, April 26 through August 24. On display will be the oldest example of human art ever found in Britain: a piece of bone incised with a beautifully drawn profile of a horse’s head—from 10,000 B.C.

According to a press release, visitors to Entertaining America: Jews, Movies, and Broadcasting, an exhibit on display at the Jewish Museum, in New York City (www.thejewishmuseum.org), through September 14, will see “a series of ‘star shrines’” that “evoke a sense of the public’s fascination with the Jewishness of such icons as Fanny Brice, Betty Boop, the Marx Brothers, John Garfield, Marilyn Monroe, and Barbra Streisand.” Elsewhere “specially built environments invite visitors into experiences that include watching silent movies in a Lower East Side storefront; rediscovering the ’alternative media’ of American Yiddish film and radio; dropping into a 1950s living room where The Goldbergs are on TV; and lounging with a laptop computer in a Seinfeld-like coffee shop.” Should lines at the last of these environments prove too long, visitors can simply walk a block east to Madison Avenue and experience it in real life.

The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum (www.gardnermuseum.org) opened in Boston in 1903. In the century since, the only change to the core collection occurred in 1990, when 13 paintings were stolen, for Gardner, a wealthy socialite, specified that the artworks she gave the museum must be displayed exactly as she left them. Despite this stricture, the museum has been far from static, as curators have added music to its offerings and exhibited a variety of artists old and new in other parts of the building. To mark its centennial, the museum is mounting two exhibits about Gardner, one focusing on her role as a pillar of Boston’s art world (with watercolors by Gardner herself) and one on her Venetian circle of artistic friends. These open in April; other exhibitions, concerts, and lectures celebrating the centennial will continue through the year.


 

Mafia Souvenirs

From Connected to Collected

It was the mob’s biggest mistake: a full-scale powwow in a podunk hideaway that blew the cover off their secret society. The 1957 fiasco held the racketeers up to ridicule and touched off a long-term decline in the power of organized crime. It also turned Apalachin, New York, the site of the sit-down, into such a landmark on the crime map that eager crowds turned out last August when the house where the meeting was held, and the belongings of the host, went under the auctioneer’s gavel. So legendary is the Apalachin “convention” that the card table on which some of the nation’s top hoodlums may or may not have played pinochle drew a bid of $18,100.

In 1957 Joseph Barbara was a successful immigrant living near Binghamton. His hilltop estate boasted seven bedrooms and two horse barns. He also was “connected”: He had friends in what would come to be known as La Cosa Nostra. When those friends needed an out-of-the-way spot to get together, Joe’s house seemed perfect. The wiseguys figured the locals were more concerned with roosters than with rackets.

But two sharp-eyed state troopers spotted the plethora of limousines and blockaded the November barbecue. The round-up of Mafia leaders—Profaci, Gambino, Genovese—made headlines around the world. Public outcry, followed by new laws and relentless surveillance, eventually paid off. The tide of organized crime receded from its late-fifties high-water mark.

Joe Barbara died in 1959, a victim of the heart disease that the mobsters offered as an excuse for their visit. His wife left many family belongings behind when she sold the estate; the go-getter who bought it had ideas of turning it into a museum, but the project didn’t pan out.

Devotees of the relics of crime are as avid as any other collectors. When the site of the 1929 St. Valentine’s Day Massacre was demolished in 1967, the bullet-pocked wall was carefully dismantled and sold brick by brick. Not long ago a collector paid $25,000 for the barber chair in which the Murder Inc. boss Albert Anastasia was himself murdered, a hit that was one of the issues on the Apalachin agenda a few months later.

Mary Ann Andrews knew she was paying too much when she offered $100 for a Limoges dish from the estate, but it was nostalgia as much as the aura of criminal celebrity that kept her in the bidding. She had gone to school with Joe Barbara, Jr., and remembered him tooling around in convertibles and taking friends out for Italian dinners at which no check was ever presented.

The Barbara possessions are scattered to the winds now. A week after the auction some had already turned up on eBay. The “Apalachin boys” have pretty much disappeared too, deposed, slain in mob wars, gunned down by old age. The former Brooklyn gang boss Joseph Bonanno, one of the last of the attendees, died in May at age 97. Apalachin itself hasn’t changed much. It remains decidedly rural, and a gathering of fancy cars might still raise an eyebrow.

Not attending the auction was the retired state trooper Vincent Vasisko, who, along with his partner, Sgt. Edgar Croswell, blew the whistle on the mob 46 years ago. He already owned the best souvenir of all, he told reporters: “Memory.”

—Jack Kelly


 

Screenings

The Many Lives of Philip Marlowe

No American writer influenced so much with so little work as Raymond Chandler. His major contribution consists of a handful of novels and story collections (all reprinted last summer by Vintage Crime and available in two handsome volumes from the Library of America) and five film scripts, including Double Indemnity (1944), adapted by Chandler and the director Billy Wilder from James M. Cain’s novel; The Blue Dahlia (1946), his only purely original writing directly for the screen; and Alfred Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train (1951), adapted from the novel by Patricia Highsmith. Chandler, more than anyone else, is responsible for the look and feel of an American style, film noir, which continues to enthrall audiences, writers, and moviemakers.

The hard-boiled lone wolf created by Dashiell Hammett and perfected by Chandler may prove to be as enduring a national symbol as the cowboy. In thinly disguised variants, Chandler’s Philip Marlowe is resurrected every few years to reinterpret our past (Jack Nicholson’s seedy late-Depression hustler in Chinatown), mirror the present (Guy Pearce’s desperate insurance investigator with short-term memory loss in Memento), and even anticipate the future (Harrison Ford’s burnout replicant hunter in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner).

Every generation, it seems, will get the Philip Marlowe it deserves. What we deserve is a DVD edition of Chandler’s greatest works, particularly at a time when his books have never been more obtainable. Until then you’ll have to hope that your video store has these classics:

Murder, My Sweet (1944). The onetime musical-comedy crooner Dick Powell became the first movie Marlowe in this version of Chandler’s novel Farewell, My Lovely. Chandler himself thought Powell was the best Philip Marlowe. Lean and mean, this was the finest hard-boiled private-eye movie between John Huston’s The Maltese Falcon in 1941 and The Big Sleep in 1946. Claire Trevor played the elusive and deadly Velma, and the wrestler-turned-character-actor Mike Mazurski was the softhearted ex-con Moose Malloy.

In 1975 the director Dick Richards filmed the novel under its original title with Charlotte Rampling as Velma; Jack O’Halloran, a former heavyweight contender, as Moose; and the great Robert Mitchum as a weary, middle-aged Philip Marlowe.

The Big Sleep (1946). Directed by Howard Hawks, this film has Bogart in one of only two private-eye roles he played in his entire career. (The other, of course, was in The Maltese Falcon.) No other film has succeeded so well in capturing the lurid, whorish atmosphere of boom-era Los Angeles, a city Chandler finally came to hate. Co-starring were Lauren Bacall, Martha Vickers, Dorothy Malone, Elisha Cook, Jr., and Bob Steele as the gunman Lash Canio—what a name! Legend has it that William Faulkner, who worked on the screenplay, couldn’t figure out who killed whom even after phoning Chandler in London.

The Lady in the Lake (1946). The other Raymond Chandler novel released on film in 1946 is now largely forgotten, but it’s worth a revival, not only because The Lady in the Lake was considered to be Chandler’s best novel (and was also, oddly enough, the only one set outside Los Angeles) but because of the director and star Robert Montgomery’s interesting gimmick of attempting to duplicate Chandler’s first-person narration by turning the camera itself into Marlowe’s eyes. (We see Montgomery only once, in a mirror reflection.)

The Long Goodbye (1973). This film splits Chandler fans right down the middle. The director Robert Altman took Chandler’s next-to-last novel and cast the unlikely Elliott Gould as a laconic, bemused Marlowe whose worldview and code of ethics are out of the late forties (he still drives a ’48 Lincoln Continental). All the other characters are set in the faster-paced, more neurotic L.A. of the 1970s. The film was intended less as an homage to Chandler than as a rethinking of the world he created. You’ll love it or hate it, but your reaction won’t be neutral. It features numerous non-actors, such as the former New York Yankees pitcher Jim Bouton, the director Mark Rydell, and Nina Van Pallandt, the girlfriend of Clifford Irving (who perpetrated the Howard Hughes autobiography hoax).

—Allen Barra


 

War Movies

The Dawn Patrol? Gun Camera Footage? It’s All Right Here.

Fifteen years ago Steve Mormando expanded his career as a U.S. Olympic sabre fencing team member (and fencing coach at NYU) to include selling old war movies. Today his catalogue, Belle & Blade, offers the largest selection of military videos anywhere; in fact, it’s so complete that it can even serve as a reference work. With the widest possible interpretation of what gives a movie a military theme, its offerings range from the 1927 The General (“Keaton’s masterpiece and probably the most formally perfect and funniest of the silent comedies …”) to Preflight Inspection of the B-17 E (“This preflight is divided into three parts. Exterior airframe, interior airframe inspection and engine check …”). Specialty items include a demonstration—the only one you’re ever likely to see—of the U.S. Army Model 1917 Six-Ton Tank (America’s first battle tank), the 1968 epic Waterloo with Christopher Plummer as Wellington, Rod Steiger as Bonaparte, and the Soviet army as the British, the French, and the Prussians (the original four-hour version is not available anywhere—Mormando is offering a reward to whoever can scratch up a print for him to look at—but even in its two-hour-and-twenty-minute length “there is not a war film that compares to the scope and power of this one”), and Gun Camera Footage of World War II. Expanding some on its franchise, the Belle & Blade catalogue also includes a vast selection of Westerns. As for the proprietor, he’s doing well enough to have just purchased a 1942 Ford three-star general’s staff car in mint condition—complete with a photo of Jimmy Doolittle in the car: “Wow! You can bet I’m having a ball!” Belle & Blade is at 124 Penn Avenue, Dover, NJ 07801; its Web site, www.belleandblade.com.