|
HISTORY NOW
George Washington Drank Here
THE FIRST PRESIDENT’S DISTILLERY WILL MAKE WHISKEY ONCE AGAIN
On the banks of the Dogue Run Creek in Fairfax County, Virginia, one chilly October morning last year, two men in waistcoats turned their attention away from stirring a pasty sour mash in a hogshead—whose sweet, beery aroma attracted and then drowned multitudes of yellow jackets—to fanning flames out of the glowing embers inside a brick firebox. Anchored to the top of the firebox was a copper pot still, shaped like a dollop of shaving cream. A modern distillery can produce four times as much in a day as George Washington’s could in a year, but the process and technology of pot-still distillation are little changed, and Washington’s venture as a distiller reveals an industrial side of him that is associated with more modern sensibilities.
As a general, George Washington deemed spirits “essential” for the morale and physical well-being of his troops. He himself was a lifelong social drinker, and when he stepped down from the Presidency in 1797, James Anderson, Mount Vernon’s farm manager, persuaded him to build a distillery. Six slaves manipulated the huge amounts of grain (60 percent rye, 35 percent Indian corn, and 5 percent malted barley) and water needed for the mash. The men tended some 50 mash tubs and fed the furnaces that kept the boiler and stills converting the mash to whiskey. The distillery flourished. In 1799 alone Washington’s five pot stills, with a combined capacity of 616 gallons, produced 11,000 gallons of rye whiskey, which generated an impressive profit of $7,500. That output, and the fact that the distillery was the largest known of its kind, offer evidence of Washington’s serious approach. This was no retiree’s hobby. But after he died in 1799, the distillery passed to other owners, and by 1808 it had ceased to operate.
In 1940 federal agents confiscated a dingy copper pot still, bearing a 1787 date, from a house in rural Fairfax County. Because of its age and locale, the pot still was assumed to have been owned by the county’s most famous distiller, and it went to the Smithsonian. It probably did not belong to Washington; holding only 30 gallons, it is much too small. Even so, last year the still was photographed and measured by Rob Sherman, operations manager of Vendome Copper and Brass Works, Inc., in Louisville, Kentucky, which has manufactured distilling equipment for a century. The company crafted an exact replica. On October 21, 13 master blenders and distillers converged at Mount Vernon to use this copy to make a historically accurate version of Washington’s whiskey recipe.
Chris Morris, master distiller at Brown-Forman Corporation, said, “The fact that Washington’s recipe was 60 percent rye makes it a powerful counterpoint to the soft scotch whiskey grain profile. The rye gives the spirit a fruity, spicy character.” Several years from now Mount Vernon Whiskey will be bottled under a special label and delivered to the highest bidders following an auction to benefit Mount Vernon’s educational programs.
All that remains of George Washington’s distillery is a low stone rectangle, incompletely enclosing several rocky trenches and some patches of burned soil. Thanks to support from DISCUS (Distilled Spirits Council of the United States), plans are under way to reconstruct the distillery on its original foundation. The project, expected to cost upward of a million dollars, is slated for completion sometime in 2006.
—Jill Sim
|
Transister Radios
The Buyable Past
Next year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the transistor radio, which, like the diminutive electronic component it’s named for, was invented in America. Using smaller solid-state devices in place of vacuum tubes, transistor radios could be scaled down considerably, yet the earliest versions sold for sums well out of proportion to their size. Most cost between $50 and $90 at a time when a new car could be had for less than $3,000.
Marketers banked on the portability of the new sets, and the first one from Japan was billed as a shirt-pocket radio when it arrived here in 1957. Sony tried to disguise the fact that the TR-63 was a bit larger than advertised by giving salesmen shirts with oversized pockets expressly tailored for the product.
The most collectible models, from 1963 and earlier, can often be identified by the triangles at 640 and 1240 kHz on their dials. Based on the civil-defense emblem, these symbols indicated the two frequencies that were to be used for emergency broadcasts in the event of a Soviet attack.
Factories here and abroad produced millions of transistor radios, with brand names from Admiral to Zephyr. Many wore stylish cases emblazoned with modern decorative motifs that included sweptback wings, stars, and, as if to remind people of the significance of those little triangles, atoms.
Prices have fallen in recent years, so this could be an opportune time to begin acquiring transistor radios. “I sold a radio on eBay not long ago for about $40 that would once have gone for $200 to $300,” reports Darryl Rehr, a Los Angeles aficionado who has several sets displayed in his office. These days, Rehr notes, $100 should buy something genuinely collectible. Rehr also says that the look of a transistor radio is more important to collectors than whether it works, so select visually interesting examples and be sure to examine their cases for cracks and other imperfections.
One rarity to watch for combines the world’s first transistor radio, the Regency TR-1, with a presentation case resembling a leather-bound copy of Jules Verne’s Around the World in Eighty Days. The producer Michael Todd had a few of these made as gifts to celebrate his film version of the novel, and back when bidding was turned up to high volume, the package was valued at upward of $4,000.
—David Lander
|
To Learn More
To find the radios you like best, consult the works of Marty Bunis, an expert whose books are available from Internet vendors.
On the Web, www.etedeschi.ndirect.co.uk/howto2.htm has lists of the most collectible radios, organized by country of origin. Several first models produced by major manufacturers are on its American to-buy roster.
|
Telling the Seabee Story
An often overlooked branch of the Navy plans a big new museum
When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, two things became instantly clear to Rear Adm. Ben Moreell: The Navy was going to have to build bases and airstrips all over the Pacific, and it couldn’t hire civilians to do it under enemy fire. Members of MoreelPs new Naval Construction Battalions became known as Seabees from their initials, and before the war was over, 350,000 of them had laid 111 major airstrips in the Pacific; led the way ashore on D-day: installed the pontoon ferries that took Patton’s troops across the Rhine; and much, much more.
They’ve played roles just as essential in every war since and in peacetime too, from Africa to Southeast Asia to the South Pole. Yet most Americans barely know they exist. To remedy that, the CEC/Seabee Historical Foundation (CEC is the Navy’s closely related Civil Engineer Corps) has embarked on a campaign to raise $12 million for a big new Seabee Museum to replace a cramped and outdated facility in Port Hueneme, California. The museum will take visitors through recruitment and training and then through the theaters of service from World War II to Iraq. Capt. W. B. Hilderbrand, the foundation’s president, hopes to have the museum open by 2007. “We want people to have a better understanding of the breadth and scope of what the Seabees have contributed to their nation in both war and peace,” he says. “And we especially want to inspire younger generations to think about opportunities they might never otherwise consider.” To find out more about the Seabees and the plans for the museum, visit the foundation’s Web site, www.seabeehf.org.
|
Happy Hour at the Shack Up Inn
For blues lovers, an authentic sharecropper’s shack—with all the modern conveniences
Robert Johnson played his blues guitar so well that it was said he’d sold his soul to the devil. Maybe he had, but it’s just as likely he learned his chops listening to other blues greats as they played on the front porches of their sharecropper shacks. That’s how a lot of Southern culture was transmitted for many years. But with the introduction of the mechanized cotton picker in 1944, plantations gave way to agribusiness, and farm laborers started streaming North. The blues became an electrified international institution, as common in the clubs of London as on the front porches of the Delta.
On a warm evening in late September, as I sat on the steps of a sharecropper shack, nursing a Corona and watching the dusk settle over cotton fields on either side of Highway 49,1 could almost hear “Terraplane Blues” in the Delta breeze. Of course, I was paying for the experience, and not with hard labor. I was a guest at the South’s oldest B&B (bed-and-beer), the Shack Up Inn, on the former Hopson Plantation in Clarksdale.
In 1998 Bill Talbot and a group of friends, one of whom was part owner of Hopson, loaded two workers’ shacks that were slated to be demolished onto a flatbed truck and hauled them to Hopson, where they renovated them. The Shack Up Inn—now six shacks—has become an international blues destination. My “shack,” the Robert Clay, named after its former occupant, was spacious, with a back bedroom, kitchen, and living room—all air-conditioned—and made even more spacious by the fact that I wasn’t raising seven sons, as Mr. Clay did.
The shacks are crammed with artifacts from all over the Delta, such as old blues records, ancient postcards, an upright piano, a guitar. (Each shack contains at least one musical instrument.) And the guests keep coming. Talbot says the partners plan to expand by putting 10 rooms in the old cotton gin and adding a main lobby. The Shack Up was convenient for me and my traveling companions, who were touring the holy sites of Delta blues, but it is also a destination in itself. We gathered on the lawn, tossed sticks to a golden retriever, and talked about music. Eventually someone brought out a guitar.
Rooms range from $50 to $75 a night, and reservations can be made by calling 662-624-8329.
—Elizabeth Hoover
|
Editors’ Bookshelf
In June of 1831, when William Chapman died mysteriously at his home near Philadelphia, suspicion lit on a mysterious stranger who had become friendly with Chapman’s wife. The case grew into a scandal and a trial so well documented that it has now become the basis for an enthralling historical account. In The Murder of Dr. Chapman (HarperCollins, 290 pages, $23.95), Linda Wolfe, whose previous books include Wasted: The Preppie Murder, makes these long-ago characters seem as lurid yet as immediate and real as any today.
Michael P. Kelley opens Where We Were in Vietnam (Hellgate Press, 848 pages, $39.95) with a quotation from Michael Herr’s 1968 book Dispatches: “There were installations as big as cities with 30,000 citizens … posh fat airconditioned camps like comfortable middle-class scenes … number-named hilltops in trouble where I didn’t want to stay; trail, paddy, swamp, deep hairy bush, scrub, swale, village, even city.…” They’re all here. Kelley has subtitled his book A Comprehensive Guide to the Firebases, Military Installations and Naval Vessels of the Vietnam War, 1945–1975, and it contains thousands upon thousands of references, glossaries of acronyms, gridded maps, everything to help the veteran find out where he was or the student identify a patch of jungle or bend of river. And throughout the cascades of information gleam interesting facts, as when we learn of the 9th Infantry Division, “Beginning in ’67 its 2nd Bde was assigned to Mobile Riverine Forces ops with the USN, the 1st time since the Civil War an army unit became amphibious and completely afloat.”
|
Why do we say that?
“Cowboy”
When, a little more than 30 years ago, the Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci asked Henry Kissinger how he had attained “incredible superstar status,” becoming “almost more famous and popular” than President Richard M. Nixon, Dr. Kissinger, then the national security adviser to the President, immediately conjured up a vision of the Old West: “I’ve always acted alone. Americans admire that enormously. Americans admire the cowboy leading the caravan alone astride his horse, the cowboy entering a village or city alone on his horse.”
Lately the cowboy image has been much in the news, with the term frequently being applied in a disparaging sense to President George W. Bush. As Paul Burka, executive editor of Texas Monthly, put it, “Foreign critics see Mr. Bush as Billy the Kid—lawless, violent, solitary and prone to shoot first and ask questions later.”
Mr. Bush may have opened himself up to this sort of criticism with his talk of bringing back Osama bin Laden “dead or alive,” but the characterization predates September 11, 2001. For example, a headline in the Toronto Staroi April 5, 2001, announced: CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER LETS LOOSE ON “COWBOY” BUSH.
The first cowboys were simply that—boys (or men, regarded as boys) who looked after cows; the word is dated in this sense in The Oxford English Dictionary to 1725. The term was given a new twist in the New World, however. During the American Revolution, Westchester County, immediately to the northeast of New York City, was the scene of much guerrilla strife, with gangs of rebels and Loyalists conducting raids on one another. Rebels called Loyalist marauders “cowboys” or “skinners.” A century later Noah Brooks offered this explanation of the old meaning of cowboy in one of his popular books for boys, The Boys of Fairport (1898): “The cowboys were the worst kind of Tories; they went around in the bushes armed with guns and tinkling a cow-bell so as to beguile the patriots into the brush hunting for cows.”
Urban cowboys appeared not long after the Revolution. From the Middlebury, Vermont, National Standard of February 27, 1821: “At the same time the streets appeared thronged with another younger set, hooting and howling, savage like, and in imitation of the licentious cow-boys and sooty chimney sweeps in the suburbs of an ill-regulated city.”
Cowboy in the modern sense, meaning a man who works on a cattle ranch, has been dated to 1849. The earliest known example comes from a history of the Mexican War: “The Mexican rancheros … ventured across the Rio Grande … but they were immediately attacked by the Texan ‘cowboys.’” The quote marks around the word suggest that the usage was new at the time.
By the start of the twentieth century, the wild, woolly ways of Western cowboys had given the term its modern, negative connotations. Thus, following the assassination of William McKinley, a longtime backer of the President—the Ohio senator Mark Hanna, who had been against Theodore Roosevelt’s nomination for Vice President—memorably tagged TR with the term, combining both its Western and disparaging senses: “Now look, that damned cowboy is President of the United States.”
Backers of the current President prefer to interpret the term in a complimentary way, of course. As Vice President Dick Cheney told Tim Russert on “Meet the Press” last March, “The notion that the President is a cowboy—I don’t know, is a Westerner—I think that’s not necessarily a bad idea. I think the fact of the matter is he cuts to the chase.”
The meaning of this particular icon, it seems, is in the eye of the beholder.
—Hugh Rawson
|
Worlds Behind Class
A new look at Joseph Cornell’s enclosed masterpieces
The eerily moving universes framed inside boxes that Joseph Cornell spent four decades creating are brought together in a truly sumptuous volume published to mark the centennial of his birth in December 2003. Joseph Cornell: Shadowplay Eterniday (Thames & Hudson, 256 pages, $60) has more than 200 color plates, many of them full page. They lead irresistibly into his compact realms of paper birds, star maps, Medici princesses, and so-called ballets, but to get you even closer, the volume includes, in a sleeve in the back, a DVD-ROM with which you can explore many of Cornell’s boxes on your computer, viewing them from multiple angles, from close and far, and navigating inside them. The DVD also contains nine short, epigrammatic films he made, bringing his unique artistic vision to another medium.
|
On Exhibit
The vitality of American culture rests on its blending of influences, and nowhere is this more true than in the hybrid field of design, as is shown by a group of current museum exhibits. From March 12 to August 8 the St. Louis Art Museum (www.slam. org) will present Art of the Osage, showing how these Indian artists assimilated into their traditional forms the work of white artists, new motifs, like the American flag, and new materials, including rayon, brass, and silk. Meanwhile, at New York City’s Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum, Shock of the Old: Christopher Dresser will be on view from March 5 to July 29. Industrial design has achieved its greatest flowering in the United States, yet its founder was British. Dresser was an industrial designer before that profession existed, creating strikingly modern-looking teapots, bowls, toast racks, and furniture as early as the 1870s. To top it all off, our great nation now has three separate Pez-dispenser museums with the opening of the newest one in Easton, Pennsylvania (“Just paces away from the Crayola factory!”; www.eastonmuseumofpez. com). Like its fellow Fez institutions in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina (“Inside Alma & Annie’s; next to ‘Adventure Falls’ mini golf”), and Burlingame, California (“ten minutes south from the San Francisco International Airport”; www.burlingamepezmuseum.com), the Easton museum packs more than half a century’s worth of design, engineering, and culture into a space about the size of a studio apartment.
|
Screenings
Gods and Generals
The very words HIstorical and film taken together suggest some kind of mildly patronizing qualification, like “military music” or “detective fiction.” There aren’t many definitions of a good film that one could apply to Gods and Generals; it is poorly paced, utterly lacking in dramatic structure (aside from the historical facts it is based on), and largely devoid of most of the artistic pleasures that we seek in movies (except, in this case, acting).
Why, then, would I recommend Gods and Generals, and to whom? First, I’d recommend it simply because historical films can sometimes give us something that other films can’t—namely, history. Second, I’d recommend it to anyone who, for a few hours, can forgo purely aesthetic considerations to see history come alive. And that is what, at its best, the director Ronald F. Maxwell’s 220-minute (not counting DVD extras) film does: It makes history come alive. Forget the contemptuous or dismissive reviews that greeted it on its release, and ask yourself if you’ve ever had a desire to see Stonewall Jackson and his world re-created. If not, go no further.
If so, you’ll have to come here, because no other film since the silent era has even attempted a portrait of Jackson. Stephen Lang, one of America’s best actors, will leave you with a vivid image of the man and the convictions that drove him. You may not like what you see, but to dismiss the movie’s reverence for Jackson as homage to a bully—and at least two major papers used precisely that word in attacking the film—is to miss the point entirely.
The novel by Jeff Shaara on which the film is based (a prequel to his late father Michael’s The Killer Angels, about the Battle of Gettysburg), focuses on the great Confederate victories at Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville, as seen through the eyes of four officers—two Confederate, Jackson and Robert E. Lee (Robert Duvall), and two Union, Winfield Scott Hancock (Brian Mallon) and Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain (Jeff Daniels). Regrettably, Hancock’s role has been downsized, either in the original script or on the cutting-room floor. For that matter, Duvall’s angst-ridden Lee, who seems to carry the burden of history with him in every word and gesture, is pushed largely into the background by Lang’s fiery Jackson. This at least has the merit of highlighting the two officers, Jackson and Chamberlain, who best reflect the opposing points of view and the cultures that nurtured them.
Gods and Generals works best when considered as a series of set pieces, many of which (such as a sequence in which a musical troupe entertains Lee and his staff with “The Bonnie Blue Flag”) are unlike anything that any other movie on the Civil War has ever attempted. The most spectacular sequences, of course, are the battles themselves. The attack of the Federals against the Stonewalls at Fredericksburg is, with the possible exception of the assault on Fort Wagner in Glory, the most harrowing depiction of Civil War combat ever put on film. The Battle of Chancellorsville, in which the camera sweeps out of the woods with Jackson’s “foot cavalry” upon bivouacked Union troops, might be the single most sensational battle scene ever in a Civil War movie.
Gods and Generals has been accused of being sympathetic to the Confederate point of view. I don’t know that this is true; I think perhaps the story lacked a proper Union general to pair with Jackson. (For all his sterling qualities, Daniels’s Chamberlain is only a colonel and thus lacks Jackson’s stature in the film.) Grant or Sherman would have been appropriate, but we won’t get them until the final installment of this three-movie series, based on Jeff Shaara’s The Last Full Measure.
—Allen Barra
|
|
| |
|
|
|