Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Thomas Paine | Thomas Jefferson | Music | Great Depression | Edison  
 
American Heritage Blog << Blog Home
 
 
 

October 1, 2006
Minimum Wage Wars

Posted by Joshua Zeitz at 09:00 PM  EST

I should be loath to position myself between Fred Smoler, who has made an informed and nuanced argument in favor of the minimum wage, and John Steele Gordon, who has flailed his arms (rhetorically speaking) and who, with his normal thin skin and penchant for drama, has taken extreme umbrage at the mere suggestion that his argument doesn’t add up, but who still feels pretty comfortable calling names and taking pot shots.

But, why not? I’m a sucker for a good argument.

Mr. Gordon writes: “To prove his point [Fred Smoler] produces modern studies that purport to show that minimum-wage hikes do not cause a net loss of jobs under current American conditions and, for all I know, they prove exactly that. I reply, there’s a guy down the street who just lost his job because his boss can’t afford to pay the new minimum wage, and a million like him elsewhere.”

To which, I reply: which guy? Show me a study. Give me a name. Stop writing in vast generalities. Where’s your evidence?

I have no doubt that someone, somewhere, has produced a study showing that the federal minimum wage has cost certain workers their jobs. But Mr. Gordon prefers invective to reasoned argument. If he has some counter-evidence to challenge or contradict Fred Smoler’s argument, he should produce it. If he doesn’t, it’s time to move on.

I happen to agree with Fred Smoler, insofar as I understand his argument that the government should concern itself with net job gains and losses. Where environmental or wage policies cost specific people their jobs, the government can and should introduce any variety of compensatory measures to provide job training, education, and relocation funds to displaced workers. This is what the Kennedy administration did when it pushed through legislation to help displaced workers in Appalachia find new jobs and develop new skills. It’s a tradition rooted firmly in economic opportunity theory, which presupposes that an economy as vibrant as America’s requires growth and adjustments, rather than a wholesale redistribution of income and assets.

But it’s worth reiterating: The minimum wage has lost 20 percent of its real value since it was last raised in 1997. How many businesses have really been shut down because they can’t afford to pay their workers $5.15 an hour? I’d genuinely like to know, and I’m waiting for Mr. Gordon to tell me.

Discuss this post
 


Browse by Week
 

October 25–31, 2006

October 17–24, 2006

October 9–16, 2006

October 1–8, 2006

 
 
 
Browse by Month
 

August 2008

February 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

 
 
Contributors
 
 

Frederick E. Allen

Allen Barra

Alexander Burns

Ellen Feldman

Julie M. Fenster

John Steele Gordon

Claire Lui

Audrey Peterson

Frederic D. Schwarz

Fredric Smoler

Richard F. Snow

Catherine Sumner

Joshua Zeitz


Contact Us >>

 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  Forbes.com  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.