Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Thomas Paine | Thomas Jefferson | Music | Great Depression | Edison  
 
American Heritage Blog << Blog Home
 
 
 

January 19, 2007
Robert E. Lee

Posted by John Steele Gordon at 01:10 PM  EST

Today is Robert E. Lee’s 200th birthday.

Surely not since Hannibal has a general on the losing side of a war achieved so much immortality. The reason for this immortality, of course, is that both Hannibal and Lee were superb and daring masters of tactics. The battle of Cannae (216 B.C.), when Hannibal annihilated a larger Roman army, is still considered perhaps the tactical masterpiece of all time.

At Chancellorsville (1863), Lee, facing a vastly larger and better equipped army, nonetheless divided his forces—usually a suicidal move in those circumstances—and achieved a smashing victory. Abraham Lincoln’s reaction was typical. Given the news, he said, “My God! My God! What will the country say?”

In both cases, the winning generals had the losing generals’ numbers. Hannibal chose a day when he knew that the impetuous Roman consul Terentius Varro would be in charge of the army, not his more cautious co-consul Aemilius Paulus. Lee played Joseph Hooker like a fiddle, bluffing him into a defensive posture when he had overwhelming superiority.

But tactics, however imbued with genius, cannot defeat in the long term an enemy possessing superior resources, unless that enemy abandons the fight. The Romans, sadder but wiser, built a new army, avoided large battles where Hannibal’s tactical genius could come into play, and slowly wore Hannibal, whose supply lines were tenuous at best, down. The Union utilized its greatly superior financial and manpower resources and, finally, found some competent generals.

It is one of the great what-ifs of American history that Lee was offered a major command in the Union Army just as the Civil War was starting. Lee had opposed secession and was willing to take that command as long as Virginia remained in the Union. When it did not, he resigned his U.S. Army commission, his loyalty to his native state overriding his loyalty to the Union. Had he seen things the other way, the Civil War might have been a lot shorter and a lot less bloody than it was.

Discuss this post
 


Browse by Week
 

January 25–31, 2007

January 17–24, 2007

January 9–16, 2007

January 1–8, 2007

 
 
 
Browse by Month
 

September 2008

August 2008

February 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

 
 
Contributors
 
 

Frederick E. Allen

Allen Barra

Alexander Burns

Ellen Feldman

Julie M. Fenster

John Steele Gordon

Claire Lui

Audrey Peterson

Frederic D. Schwarz

Fredric Smoler

Richard F. Snow

Catherine Sumner

Joshua Zeitz


Contact Us >>

 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  Forbes.com  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.