Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Thomas Paine | Thomas Jefferson | Music | Great Depression | Edison  
 
American Heritage Blog << Blog Home
 
 
 

February 16, 2007
Dragging Lincoln Into Iraq III

Posted by Fredric Smoler at 02:00 PM  EST

Fred Allen posts, with understandable asperity and admirable terseness, on Rep. Don Young of Alaska, who has recited on the floor of the House a fabricated Lincoln quote, one claiming that congressmen who damage morale in wartime should be arrested, exiled or hanged. Lincoln did not say this. But Lincoln did in effect exile a Congressman, Democrat Clement Vallandigham of Ohio, who had given an antiwar speech saying that the Civil War was being fought to liberate blacks and enslave whites. This does seem at least roughly comparable to saying that the Iraq war has been fought only to fatten profits for corporate America, aid Israeli racist aggression against the Palestinians, and establish American world empire, and for no better motives, which is the sort of thing people say all the time. Defending the treatment of Vallandigham, Lincoln wrote to another congressman, the Democrat Erastus Corning, that “long experience has shown that armies can not be maintained unless desertion shall be punished by the severe penalty of death. The case requires, and the law and the Constitution sanction, this punishment—Must I shoot a simple-minded soldier boy who deserts, while I must not touch a hair of a wiley agitator who induces him to desert?”

But the story is a little complicated: Lincoln did not approve in advance Vallandigham’s arrest by General Ambrose Burnside (the man who presided over the slaughter of the Army of the Potomac at Fredericksburg), regretted that the arrest had occurred, and when he had Vallandigham sent through Confederate lines in Tennessee was in fact tempering a court martial verdict that had ordered Vallandigham imprisoned for the duration of the war. He did not exile Vallandigham in the normal sense of the word, because Lincoln did not recognize the sovereignty of the Confederacy, so Lincoln in effect had Vallandigham sent from one portion of U.S. territory to another. When Vallandigham later came back into Union-controlled territory from Canada, Lincoln left the man unmolested, and Vallandigham was allowed to engage in political activity with perfect impunity.

On the other hand, the letter to Corning suggests that Lincoln at least had some grave reservations about antiwar figures encouraging desertion. Now I can readily imagine people in the antiwar movement encouraging desertion—after all, this happened during Vietnam, and I would be amazed if it hasn’t happened during the Iraq War. So I can imagine Lincoln taking much tougher measures than practiced by either Lyndon Johnson or George Bush—because he did.

Discuss this post
 


Browse by Week
 

February 25–29, 2007

February 17–24, 2007

February 9–16, 2007

February 1–8, 2007

 
 
 
Browse by Month
 

September 2008

August 2008

February 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

 
 
Contributors
 
 

Frederick E. Allen

Allen Barra

Alexander Burns

Ellen Feldman

Julie M. Fenster

John Steele Gordon

Claire Lui

Audrey Peterson

Frederic D. Schwarz

Fredric Smoler

Richard F. Snow

Catherine Sumner

Joshua Zeitz


Contact Us >>

 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  Forbes.com  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.