Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Subscription | Immigration | Great Depression | Florida Sites | Elvis Presley  
 
American Heritage Blog << Blog Home
 
 
 

February 22, 2007
Greatness at the Pentagon?

Posted by Alexander Burns at 02:45 PM  EST

During Joshua Zeitz and John Steele Gordon’s recent discussion of the Confederate flag and the South Carolina primary, my attention was caught by a comment by that primary’s most famous victim, John McCain. A few days ago, speaking in the Palmetto State, Senator McCain declared that Donald Rumsfeld “will go down in history as one of the worst secretaries of defense in history.” Redundant phrasing aside, McCain’s comment got me thinking: If Rumsfeld may be remembered as one of the Pentagon’s worst leaders, who should be remembered as its best?

Unlike other cabinet positions, the office of defense secretary lacks a modern historical figure to define the way the job ought to be conducted. The Treasury Department has had exemplary leaders like C. Douglas Dillon and Robert Rubin. State Department officials can look up to figures like John Foster Dulles and Dean Rusk. Men like Nicholas Katzenbach and Eliot Richardson can serve as the very models for a modern attorney general. Who, among America’s defense secretaries, can claim to occupy a similar role in the national memory?

This is not merely a rhetorical question; I am genuinely curious as to what answers my fellow bloggers might offer. I suppose the place to begin would be by defining the criteria by which one judges a secretary of defense. Presumably, they must include capability at managing the Pentagon bureaucracy, skill in obtaining funds on Capitol Hill, success at overseeing the military during violent conflict, and wisdom in advising the President.

Clearly, a great defense secretary should have some combination of these accomplishments, along with a healthy dose of personal character. Looking down the list of Pentagon leaders, however, I fail to see one who is widely recognized for having achieved this. Surely George Marshall was a great man, but his tenure at the Pentagon was relatively insignificant. Robert McNamara was a technocrat and administrator extraordinaire—but he oversaw Vietnam. Caspar Weinberger was a temperate, deft manager who helped conduct some successful military operations. But then, one recalls, there’s Iran-Contra.

It’s worth noting that AmericanHeritage.com took an online poll on this subject some time ago. Weinberger came out way ahead.

Discuss this post
 


Browse by Week
 

February 25–28, 2007

February 17–24, 2007

February 9–16, 2007

February 1–8, 2007

 
 
 
Browse by Month
 

November 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

September 2008

August 2008

February 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

 
 
Contributors
 
 

Frederick E. Allen

Allen Barra

Alexander Burns

Ellen Feldman

Julie M. Fenster

John Steele Gordon

Claire Lui

Audrey Peterson

Frederic D. Schwarz

Fredric Smoler

Richard F. Snow

Catherine Sumner

Joshua Zeitz


Contact Us >>

 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  HeritageSites.us  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.