Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Thomas Paine | Thomas Jefferson | Music | Great Depression | Edison  
 
American Heritage Blog << Blog Home
 
 
 

May 1, 2007
Citizen Kane and Prince Charles II

Posted by Alexander Burns at 01:45 PM  EST

Thanks to John Steele Gordon for pointing out my unclear wording. Undoubtedly, I should have written: “I suppose, by Bragg’s preferences, the producers of Citizen Kane should still be liable to the estate of William Randolph Hearst for possible distortions of the man’s character.” In any case, though, I intended this comment as a figure of speech. The producers of Citizen Kane, Orson Welles and RKO Radio Pictures, are no longer in any position to be sued. Alternatively, I could have said something like, “By Bragg’s preferences, the producers of Gangs of New York should be liable to the estate of William Marcy Tweed.” Except, I’d be quite flabbergasted if Tweed ever had an active estate.

As for the British royal family, Mr. Gordon is probably right that “their improprieties and moral behavior” have not been “any worse than that of millions of other British families who do not have to live their lives in goldfish bowls.” Of course, those millions of other British families are in no way charged with providing moral leadership for the country. It seems to me that the only way to really justify the continued existence of the Civil List is for the monarchy to provide an instructive, ornamental example of traditional British values. Even then, though, public financial support of the monarchy still seems pretty wasteful. Mr. Gordon and I had a good exchange a while back about American politicians and their decorating expenditures. The wastefulness of the Clintons’ White House redecoration, which we both deplored, was insignificant compared to the millions of pounds poured down the drain each year keeping up Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle.

In the previously mentioned series House of Cards, there’s a character who, despite his loathing of the king (Kitchen), admits that the monarchy saves Britons from “having to elect some godawful President.” Like Mr. Gordon, I’d choose Prince Charles as my leader over Edward VIII, but, frankly, I’d rather have a President.

Discuss this post
 


Browse by Week
 

May 25–31, 2007

May 17–24, 2007

May 9–16, 2007

May 1–8, 2007

 
 
 
Browse by Month
 

February 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

 
 
Contributors
 
 

Frederick E. Allen

Allen Barra

Alexander Burns

Ellen Feldman

Julie M. Fenster

John Steele Gordon

Claire Lui

Audrey Peterson

Frederic D. Schwarz

Fredric Smoler

Richard F. Snow

Catherine Sumner

Joshua Zeitz


Contact Us >>

 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  Forbes.com  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.