Just where and how are the novelist’s skills useful to the historian?
Some of them, obviously, the historian picks up only at the risk of his professional integrity. The bestseller lists in years past (to say nothing of the longer list of books which aimed at that target and missed) are full of distressing examples of “fictionalized” history, “reconstructed” events for which there can be no documentation, conversations invented to fit historic situations, accounts of thoughts and emotions which imaginative writers have put into the heads of historic characters. For all of these, in works which claim anyone’s serious attention, there can be no real justification.
Yet there is one talent which the historian can properly borrow from the novelist—namely, mastery of the art of communication via the written word. When he is addressing the general reader this is a talent which he desperately needs. At the very least, he wants the reader to stay with him while he tells his tale; he wants, in short, to be read. To be read he must be interesting.