Skip to main content

Webster Enters The Case

April 2023
2min read

The killing of the venerable Captain White was so mysterious and frightful that it attracted widespread attention before Senator Daniel Webster stepped on the scene. But his consent to appear for the prosecution gave it unprecedented notoriety.

In the summer of 1830, Webster, in his forty-ninth year, was at the absolute height of his fame—the Cicero of America, the matchless orator of the Dartmouth College Case, the Plymouth Oration, and the more recent Reply to Hayne, and not yet the perennially disappointed candidate for the Presidency. He had been elected in June, 1827, to the U.S. Senate.

Webster had had his own personal sorrows as well as his public triumphs. In January, 1828, his wife of twenty years, Grace Fletcher Webster, died after a painful illness, and his second wife, Caroline Le Roy, did not have an equally restraining influence upon him. Webster, always a free spender, lapsed deeper and deeper into debt.

In January, 1830, a bridegroom of only a few weeks, Webster reached his eloquent zenith in his Reply to Hayne, and from that moment he was regarded as the outstanding spokesman for the Union. When the twenty-third Congress closed its first session on May 31, Webster made his way, in the slow fashion of those days, back to New England. While in the capital, he had read of the White murder; and his friend, Justice Joseph Story, had written him from Cambridge giving some of the gory details. Stephen White, the man who invited Webster to enter the case, was Captain white's nephew and had married Judge Story's sister; White's daughter later married Webster's son, Fletcher. Many ramifications of this crime gave it the aspect of a family affair.

Harriet Martineau, in her Retrospect of Western Travel (1838), told how the rusticating statesman was persuaded to assist in the prosecution of the Knapps:

“A citizen of Salem, a friend of mine, was deputed to carry the request.… Mr. Webster was at his farm by the seashore. Thither, in tremendous weather, my friend followed him. Mr. Webster was playing checkers … My friend was first dried and refreshed, and then lost no time in mentioning business. Mr. Webster writhed at the word, saying that he came hither to get out of the hearing of it. He next declared that his undertaking anything more was entirely out of the question, and pointed, in evidence, to his swollen bag of briefs lying in a corner. However, upon a little further explanation and meditation, he agreed to the request with the same good grace with which he afterward went to the task. He made himself master of all that my friend could communicate, and before daybreak was off through the woods, in the unabated storm, no doubt meditating his speech by the way. He needed all the assistance that could be given him, of course; and my friend constituted himself as Mr. Webster's fetcher and carrier of facts.… At the appointed hour, Mr. Webster was completely ready.”

Webster was badly needed at Salem, for the attorney general, Perez Morton, fifty-nine years out of Harvard College, was aged and infirm, and the principal counsels for the defense, Dexter and Gardiner, were by no means novices. But a still stronger motive was his desire for money. The prospect of a thousand-dollar fee could not be ignored by a man periodically harassed by his creditors. His eight-dollar-a-day salary as senator would hardly have paid his wine bill.

Unquestionably Webster earned his fee—and more. He spent seventeen humid summer days, from August 3 to August 20, in Salem, when he might have been resting or fishing at his farm in Marshfield. Furthermore, after the conviction of Frank Knapp, he returned to Salem in November to devote six more days to the trial of Joseph Knapp—for which extra labor he received no fee whatever.

The public excitement during this trial was described as “prodigious.” On August 15 the Salem Gazette reported, “Hundreds of individuals were gathered around the Court House, being enabled by the powerful voice and distinct enunciation of Mr. W. to hear the greater part of his address to the jury from the street.”

Daniel Webster returned to Marshfield in late August, apparently quite satisfied with the convictions, his own speeches, and his remuneration. He did not attend the hanging of Frank Knapp, and when George Crowninshield was tried in November, Webster had to keep an engagement in the Rhode Island courts and could not go to Salem. At this trial the government was represented only by the attorney general and the solicitor general. George, although far from being a paragon of virtue, was quite rightly acquitted.

—Claude M. Fuess

We hope you enjoy our work.

Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage.


Stories published from "June 1960"

Authored by: Charles Boswell

Foul was fair, and fair foul, when eight players of the championship White Sox conspired with gamblers to throw the 1919 World Series

Authored by: Harold A. Larrabee

To the question of acquiring new territories overseas, and owning colonies, one group of Americans answered with a resounding “No!”

Authored by: William H. Townsend

Alone in his empty mansion, the venerable Cassius Clay took unto himself a scandalously youthful bride; when the posse came for him, they met more than their match

Authored by: Marshall B. Davidson

Flags flew and champagne flowed when the Czar’s ships anchored in New York Harbor. Fifty years later we learned the reason for their surprise visit

Authored by: J. H. Plumb

Cursed by ancestry,bedeviled by his posterity, beset by forces he could not grasp, George III is usually remembered as the ogre of Jefferson’s Declaration. An eminent English historian reassesses that strange and pathetic personality

Authored by: A. L. Todd

As the debate about rescuing them droned on and on, Lieutenant Greely’s men were dying one by one

Authored by: Charles P. Curtis

When four aristocratic blackquards were jailed for a brutal murder, justice seemed triumphant. But these were no ordinary criminals, and justice needed eloquent help

Authored by: Murat Halstead

In 1860, Southern delegates bolted the Democratic convention at Charleston. An eyewitness describes the first giant step toward secession

Authored by: Rudolf A. Clemen

To Falstaff’s question, early America gave an unequivocal answer. Its roadside taverns were the traveler’s refuge and the townsman’s club

Featured Articles

The world’s most prominent actress risked her career by standing up to one of Hollywood’s mega-studios, proving that behind the beauty was also a very savvy businesswoman. 

Rarely has the full story been told about how a famed botanist, a pioneering female journalist, and First Lady Helen Taft battled reluctant bureaucrats to bring Japanese cherry trees to Washington. 

Often thought to have been a weak president, Carter was strong-willed in doing what he thought was right, regardless of expediency or the political fallout.

Why have thousands of U.S. banks failed over the years? The answers are in our history and politics.

In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln embodied leading in a time of polarization, political disagreement, and differing understandings of reality.