Skip to main content

Marshall Continued

March 2023
1min read

The information presented in your March issue can hardly fail to damage S. L. A. Marshall’s reputation. I feel that despite the editors’ obvious wish to be considerate, the article made far too much of the lapses that have come to light, unless there is more damning evidence elsewhere.

Over the years Marshall offered numerous generalizations, large and small, that put him at odds with received U.S. military ideas. He said bayonets were obsolete, called individual rotation a bad idea, held that GIs were sent into combat overloaded, called our trench works in Korea ill-engineered, and explained why headlong assaults got nowhere against Vietcong villages. Was everything he said fabricated out of whole cloth? If not, why should his fire-ratio statements, based upon an unrivaled breadth of observation, be singled out for attack? Clearly only because they are perceived as disparaging by some ex-GIs. But Marshall nowhere presented them as peculiar to American troops. His book is called Men Against Fire, not Americans Against Fire . Anyone reading it without prejudice can see that Marshall viewed himself as presenting findings generally applicable to Western citizen armies. That is how they are understood by most military historians. An attempt to discredit Marshall in the name of rescuing the honor of the American GI is ludicrously off target. With exceptions for some particular units, friend and foe alike—the Germans, Japanese, and British in World War II, the Chinese in Korea, the Vietnamese and Australians in Vietnam, and the Marines throughout—have consistently viewed the U.S. Army infantry as mediocre in individual and unit performance. Such professional esteem as it still enjoys is very largely the work of S. L. A. Marshall.

We hope you enjoy our work.

Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage.


Stories published from "September/October 1989"

Authored by: Avis Berman

American art was hardly more than a cultural curiosity in the early years of this century. Now it is among the world’s most influential, and much of the credit belongs to a self-made woman named Juliana Force.

Authored by: Robert Bendiner

A lifelong baseball fan recalls his early days and explains the rewards of abject loyalty

Authored by: The Editors

A History of America’s Civil Rights Movement

Authored by: The Editors

The Development of Jazz, 1930–1945

Authored by: Geoffrey C. Ward

Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt’s honeymoon was a lavish grand tour through a sunny, hospitable Europe. It was also filled with signs of the mutual bafflement that would one day embitter their marriage.

Authored by: Robert L. O’connell

The urge to move documents as fast as possible has always been a national pre-occupation, because it has always been a necessity. Fax and Federal Express are just the latest among many innovations for getting the message across.

Featured Articles

The world’s most prominent actress risked her career by standing up to one of Hollywood’s mega-studios, proving that behind the beauty was also a very savvy businesswoman. 

Rarely has the full story been told about how a famed botanist, a pioneering female journalist, and First Lady Helen Taft battled reluctant bureaucrats to bring Japanese cherry trees to Washington. 

Often thought to have been a weak president, Carter was strong-willed in doing what he thought was right, regardless of expediency or the political fallout.

Why have thousands of U.S. banks failed over the years? The answers are in our history and politics.

In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln embodied leading in a time of polarization, political disagreement, and differing understandings of reality.