Skip to main content

Southern Violence, Southern Honor

April 2023
1min read

In “Legacy of Violence” (October) Edward L. Ayers makes a case for a Southern propensity to violence. The many examples he cites of mayhem and murderous activity make it hard to dismiss Mr. Ayers as bigoted or rash in his judgments.

Nevertheless, the American frontier was always an intriguing interplay between codes of conduct and our more human traits. The viciousness of backwoods battles, using knives, thumbnails, and teeth, is not so far removed from bar brawls in any American city today. From what I gather, the participants do not act so much out of cultural imperatives but simply out of a desire to survive. It’s the Rule of the Knife Fight: in a knife fight, there are no rules.

I am Texan. It has been simply generations since any of my family stabbed, shot, beat, or assaulted anyone. My great-grandfather, a Confederate veteran, was certainly touched by violence when he was lynched on Christmas Eve, 1883, in a small Central Texas town. The reason, still a little unclear after all this time, likely had more to do with lawlessness and less with honor. But then, like so much of history, it pretty much depends on the perspective.

The South had a sufficient share of liars, scoundrels, cheats, and psychopaths. So, too, did the North. They are with us still. But honor was an extension of the individual response to the hardships and cruelties of nineteenthcentury life, a ladder out of the mire. There was a passion and commitment to those ideals that is sadly lacking in our own time. People lived lives and made decisions out of a sense of something greater than themselves—or tried to.

A few years ago I interviewed the Texas historian T. R. Fehrenbach on the state’s one hundred and fiftieth anniversary. While talking about the 1836 battle of the Alamo, Mr. Fehrenbach acknowledged that most of the defenders were drifters and adventurers with little actual stake in rebellion from Mexico. Still, 189 or so stayed inside an old Spanish mission to fight against a Mexican army of at least 1,800. They did so, Mr. Fehrenbach said, out of honor and a sense of duty that transcended personal considerations. “It is difficult,” he said, “to explain why someone would be willing to die for honor to a nation of people who relentlessly jog and lift weights out of a fear that they will not live forever.”

We hope you enjoy our work.

Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage.


Stories published from "February/March 1992"

Authored by: John McDonough

Seventy-five years ago this month, a not especially good band cut a record that transformed our culture

Authored by: The Editors

For seventy-five years a procession of timeless jazz moments has been captured on disk. Here are some of the very best.

Authored by: Nathan Ward

The Telegraph

Authored by: Nathan Ward

Willful Men

Authored by: Nathan Ward

Fifty Years Ago Separate and Unequal

Authored by: Nathan Ward

Adam’s Fall

Authored by: Fredric Smoler

The fiercest struggle going on in education is about who owns the past. Militant multi-culturalists say that traditional history teaching has brushed out minority ethnic identities. Their opponents say that radical multiculturalism leads toward national fragmentation.

Authored by: John Lukacs

The Cold War was an anomaly: more often than not the world’s two greatest states have lived together in uneasy amity. And what now?

Authored by: Harrison E. Salisbury

The Russians claim they want to be more like us— but do they have any idea who we are?

Featured Articles

The world’s most prominent actress risked her career by standing up to one of Hollywood’s mega-studios, proving that behind the beauty was also a very savvy businesswoman. 

Rarely has the full story been told about how a famed botanist, a pioneering female journalist, and First Lady Helen Taft battled reluctant bureaucrats to bring Japanese cherry trees to Washington. 

Often thought to have been a weak president, Carter was strong-willed in doing what he thought was right, regardless of expediency or the political fallout.

Why have thousands of U.S. banks failed over the years? The answers are in our history and politics.

In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln embodied leading in a time of polarization, political disagreement, and differing understandings of reality.