Skip to main content

The Love Of Wampum Was The Root Of All Evil

March 2023
1min read

A little over three hundred years ago, according to an intriguing new theory, the cluster of Dutch settlements that was to become New York City was brought to its financial knees—not by uncontrolled welfare costs, increased labor costs, budgetary bungling, or general mismanagement, but by small beads no more than 9.5 millimeters long and 3.2 millimeters in diameter. Strung together in six-foot lengths (called fathoms), these tiny ornaments, in the view of anthropologist Lynn Ceci of Queens College, New York, were a major cause not only of the Pequot Indian War of the 1630’s but also of a great wampum crisis of the 1660’s that ended in Dutch New Amsterdam’s becoming British New York without a shot being fired.

For the beads were wampum, which is to say, money, and for a time wampum, backed by the “Fur Standard,” was the principal medium of exchange in a region that had little other coinage. Most of the beads were made from certain mollusk shells by coastal tribes from Rhode Island to New Jersey and traded to the Dutch of New Amsterdam and the English of New England for cloth and other European goods. The whites then used the wampum to buy furs from the Iroquois and other inland tribes who valued the beads.

In 1637, when the Pequots of Connecticut had established control over many of the wampum-making tribes, the British, according to Ceci’s new interpretation, launched war against the Pequots to seize control of the source of the wealth for themselves. They were successful, and the consequent availability of large amounts of cheap wampum in their own hands gave the New Englanders a great advantage over their Dutch fur-trading rivals. That advantage was strengthened in 1652 when the Massachusetts Bay Colony began minting the pine tree shilling, which quickly replaced wampum as the medium of exchange among the British colonies. These were only too happy, however, to use wampum in trading with the Dutch, and the result was inflation of profound dimensions as the British “dumped” thousands of fathoms of wampum into the Dutch economy. “Dutch farmers, laborers, and soldiers,” Ceci notes, “were impoverished as the cost of goods and wages soared in New Amsterdam, the price of bread and shoes, for example, rising as much as 400 percent.”

By the 1660’s New Amsterdam was staggering, and when the Duke of York decided to seize the territory in 1664, the Dutch were helpless to resist. New Amsterdam thus became New York—the creation of a bunch of beads.

We hope you enjoy our work.

Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage.


Stories published from "October 1977"

Authored by: John G.mitchell

The Last Stand of King Grizzly

Authored by: Don Moser

The U-2, Cuba, and the CIA

Authored by: Calvin Trillin

There are over 3,000 county courthouse across the country -- staunch hometown symbols of our faith in our ability to govern ourselves

Authored by: Gerald Carson

The Curious World of the Trademark

Authored by: Richard Rhodes

The Agony of J. Robert Oppenheimer

Authored by: Joe McCarthy

The doughboys numbered only 550 men -- the remnants of four battalions -- and were surrounded by Germans. Then they were given the order to attack.

Authored by: The Editors

to Joseph P. Lash for Roosevelt and Churchill, 1939–1941: The Partnership That Saved the West

Authored by: Ruth Hume

Jenny Lind and P.T. Barnum

Featured Articles

The world’s most prominent actress risked her career by standing up to one of Hollywood’s mega-studios, proving that behind the beauty was also a very savvy businesswoman. 

Rarely has the full story been told about how a famed botanist, a pioneering female journalist, and First Lady Helen Taft battled reluctant bureaucrats to bring Japanese cherry trees to Washington. 

Often thought to have been a weak president, Carter was strong-willed in doing what he thought was right, regardless of expediency or the political fallout.

Why have thousands of U.S. banks failed over the years? The answers are in our history and politics.

In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln embodied leading in a time of polarization, political disagreement, and differing understandings of reality.