Skip to main content

Doc Kearns’s Last Dirty Trick

April 2023
1min read

Doc Kearns, Dempsey’s hustling manager, fought bitterly with the champion later in his career, and, as was his way, showered abuse on his former protege. The two men never really made up. In fact, the last piece of nastiness that Doc tossed at Jack came virtually from the grave. Shortly before Kearns died in 1963, he had completed the manuscript for his autobiography. In talking about the Willard fight, Kearns described how he had started worrying about the $ 10,000 he had bet on a first-round victory, and how he had decided to help the results along. Unknown to his fighter, he asserted, he had sprinkled the wrappings that go under a boxer’s gloves with plaster of Paris, and had then doused them with water before lacing on Jack’s gloves.

The first that Dempsey knew about this was in January, 1964, when Sports Illustrated published Doc’s account with the headline “ DEMPSEY’S GLOVES WERE LOADED .” Dempsey promptly sued for libel. In his forthcoming autobiography, Dempsey describes how evidence flooded in to support his case. One man turned out to have the actual bandages, which he had picked up off the floor of Dempsey’s dressing room and kept for a souvenir. Another fan, an ex-fighter, had kept the gloves Dempsey wore in the fight. Manufacturers of plaster of Paris wrote to say that it would take about five layers of their product to create a rock-hard wrapping, and that anyway there had not been time for it to set. Various doctors and experts assured Dempsey that had Kearns’s charge bee.i true, he would have broken all the bones in his hands, let alone every bone in Willard’s face. In short, the story seemed preposterous. The case was settled out of court, and a formal apology was printed. Three years later, when the book was published, the charge had been deleted. “From wherever he was,” Dernpsey writes in his new book, “Jack Kearns had managed to give me one more good swift kick in the butt. The man was not to be believed !”

We hope you enjoy our work.

Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage.

Donate

Stories published from "April 1977"

Authored by: Alfred A. Knopf

One of America's most distinguished publishers writes of his personal and professional friendship with the famed historian, Samuel Eliot Morison.

Authored by: William Ashworth

Man, Land, and History in the Deepest Gorge on Earth

Authored by: Bernard A. Weisberger

The Man, the Myth, and the Midnight Ride

Authored by: Clark M. Clifford

The behind-the-scenes struggle in 1948 between the President and the State Department

Authored by: Thomas K. Mccraw

The Regulatory Agencies

Authored by: Leon Harris

“The world is my country, to hate rascals is my religion” he once said, and for more than forty years—before he mysteriously vanished—he blasted away at the delusions, pretentions, posturings, hopes, dreams, foibles, and institutions of all mankind. His name was Ambrose Bierce …

How I Beat Jess Willard

Authored by: T. H. Watkins

In southern California the orange found a home.

Authored by: James Axtell

In recent years many voices—both Native-American and white—have questioned whether Indians did in fact invent scalping. What is the evidence?

Featured Articles

The world’s most prominent actress risked her career by standing up to one of Hollywood’s mega-studios, proving that behind the beauty was also a very savvy businesswoman. 

Rarely has the full story been told about how a famed botanist, a pioneering female journalist, and First Lady Helen Taft battled reluctant bureaucrats to bring Japanese cherry trees to Washington. 

Often thought to have been a weak president, Carter was strong-willed in doing what he thought was right, regardless of expediency or the political fallout.

Why have thousands of U.S. banks failed over the years? The answers are in our history and politics.

In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln embodied leading in a time of polarization, political disagreement, and differing understandings of reality.