Skip to main content

Mr. Graham Replies

March 2023
1min read

Sir: … The point at issue in my article was Senator Muskie’s decision to support the declassification of the Prestile. In the light of the state’s claim that Vahlsing had violated antipollution regulations thirty-one times in the previous five years, this support cannot be justified. Trouble was inevitable.

It is true that the Prestile was polluted long before 1965. But the town of Mars Hill had invested in a treatment plant, and its efforts were undone by the potato wastes. Indeed, I wrote that by 1965 “The Prestile’s quality was B only on the W.I.C.'s [Water Improvement Commission] books; in fact, it had become an open sewer.”

I do not defend Maine’s antiquated pollution laws. I simply said that the proposal to lower the Prestile’s classification was a device to circumvent even those deficient laws.

I specifically said that the sugar-beet refinery “apparently has not become a source of pollution.” I pointed out that by lowering the classification and by backing millions of dollars of loans to Vahlsing, state officials obviously had hindered the legal effort to secure abatement of the potato wastes. In this sense the state took the company “off the hook” and opened the way to the 1968 border incident.

Finally, I did not attempt to measure Senator Muskie’s affection for Fred Vahlsing. Whatever its degree, however, I am certain it was strained by the fiasco on the New Brunswick border.

As for Mr. Erwin, I did not mention his name in the article, and I sympathize with his plight. In the passages he objected to I was making the point that neither he nor his predecessor could move effectively against the pollution without jeopardizing the state’s investment in the sizable sugar-beet loans. The resultant flurry of legal activity which was slow to produce results became a source of the conservationists’ dissatisfaction.

We hope you enjoy our work.

Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage.

Donate

Stories published from "August 1970"

Authored by: Richard M. Ketchum

You are conducting secret peace talks with the enemy in the midst of an unpopular and interminable foreign war. The American field commander is throwing every obstacle in your path. Then, just as the talks are getting somewhere, the President orders you home. What do you do now?

Authored by: The Editors

ANNOUNCING THE WINNERS

Authored by: Arthur B. Tourtellot

Death, hunger, disease, and suffering from bitter cold or sweltering heat were common experiences on the dozen British prison ships in New York harbor during the Revolution.

Authored by: Avon Neal

Sermons in Stones

Authored by: Mark Sufrin

Why did people fall mortally ill wherever she worked? Typhoid Mary was not about to help the inspector find out

Authored by: John Brooks

“In terms of change in American attitudes and American values, these last five years have surely been the crucial ones in the quarter century since V-J Day. And these changes seem of such a magnitude that every American except the very young, the very empty, and the very enclosed must now, to some extent, feel himself a foreigner in his native land”

Authored by: Jonathan Aitken

From John Bull to Uncle Sam:

Authored by: John Graves

The “memory paintings” of a lady now ninety-four celebrate the life of rural Texas as it was when she grew up there

Authored by: Walter Sullivan

America’s greed for oil has drastically upset the ecological balance of Alaska’s North Slope, and the end is not in sight

Featured Articles

Rarely has the full story been told about how a famed botanist, a pioneering female journalist, and First Lady Helen Taft battled reluctant bureaucrats to bring Japanese cherry trees to Washington. 

Often thought to have been a weak president, Carter was strong-willed in doing what he thought was right, regardless of expediency or the political fallout.

Why have thousands of U.S. banks failed over the years? The answers are in our history and politics.

In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln embodied leading in a time of polarization, political disagreement, and differing understandings of reality.

Native American peoples and the lands they possessed loomed large for Washington, from his first trips westward as a surveyor to his years as President.