Skip to main content

The Vindicators

March 2023
1min read

Closely related to nostalgia for a former era is admiration for some individual historical figure who in one way or another has particular appeal. It may be a man whose personality was powerfully attractive to his contemporaries, like George Washington, or it may be quite the reverse. There seems to be a type of history buff who especially enjoys trying to vindicate the memory of someone who in his own lifetime fell into disrepute. For example, we got a letter from the General Charles Lee Research Committee, of Lee, Massachusetts, objecting to the reproduction of Emanuel Leutze’s long-lost painting of Washington cursing at Lee at the Battle of Monmouth (A MERICAN H ERITAGE , June, 1965). This, they said, was “a further extension of the unfair legend of General Lee,” after whom their town is named. We have written the committee, pointing out that we never claimed historical precision as one of Leutze’s virtues; and we are glad to note further, here, that this group of Lee champions does not seem inclined to romanticize their hero. While they claim that Lee was “a philosopher, an expert soldier, and a lover of liberty,” and that the testimony at his court martial was inadequate proof of his guilt in the Monmouth incident, they also upbraid Leutze for showing Lee “with a rather nice face,” when in fact he was “probably the homeliest man who ever donned a United States Army uniform”—a harsh judgment, we feel.

We also have a communication from the American Society for the Faithful Recording of History, of Buffalo, New York—which despite its broad title appears to be narrowly focussed on correcting “the prolonged President Harding smear.” Mr. Edwin K. Gross, who is listed without company on the society’s letterhead as “a Harding Historian” as well as “Founder and National Executive,” was much annoyed by Bruce Bliven’s article in our August issue, “Tempest over Teapot,” which went into the peculations of the Harding administration in some detail. We must admit that he has caught us and Mr. Bliven in one flat-footed error: the statement that Albert B. Fall, Secretary of the Interior, was “dismissed by Harding’s successor, President Coolidge.” Mr. Gross is quite right in saying that Fall resigned from the Cabinet while Harding was still President.

We hope you enjoy our work.

Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage.


Stories published from "February 1966"

Authored by: George McMillan

So thought many a weary Marine after the bloody, interminable battle for Guadalcanal. It was only a dot in the ocean, but upon its possession turned the entire course of the Pacific war

Authored by: David G. Lowe

Three long-lost paintings of Washington in action (above, at Germantown) were part of G.W.P. Custis’ lifelong effort to glorify the foster father he adored

Authored by: David McCullough

One thing was clear through the rain and the mist: America’s enthusiasm for Miss Liberty matched her colossal dimensions

Authored by: The Editors

In her later years, Dolley was urbane and gracious, but ruined financially by her spendthrift son.

Authored by: Henry Steele Commager

By no means, said W. H. Prescott. Absolutely, said Lord Acton. The question remains hard—and intriguing

Authored by: Roger M. Williams

A Grave Question for Georgians…

Authored by: Wendy Buehr


Authored by: John Dos Passos

No one who met him ever forgot him. His charm captivated beautiful women, his eloquence moved the United States Senate to tears, his political skills carried him to the very threshold of the White House. Yet while still Vice President he was indicted for murder, and was already dreaming the dreams of empire that would bring him to trial for treason. After a century and a half, historians still cannot decide whether he was a traitor, a con man, or a mere adventurer. Now, a distinguished writer enters the controversy with an account of

Authored by: Gerald Carson

In Jackson’s day you were damned if you wore a beard; by Lincoln’s, damned if you didn’t. Then beards were suddenly ‘out “—for good, it seemed. But were they?

Authored by: Robert E. Cunningham

When the Oklahoma District was opened, boomers staked their claims. Sooners staked theirs sooner. Thousands of both were on hand, all with a single aim:

Featured Articles

The world’s most prominent actress risked her career by standing up to one of Hollywood’s mega-studios, proving that behind the beauty was also a very savvy businesswoman. 

Rarely has the full story been told about how a famed botanist, a pioneering female journalist, and First Lady Helen Taft battled reluctant bureaucrats to bring Japanese cherry trees to Washington. 

Often thought to have been a weak president, Carter was strong-willed in doing what he thought was right, regardless of expediency or the political fallout.

Why have thousands of U.S. banks failed over the years? The answers are in our history and politics.

In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln embodied leading in a time of polarization, political disagreement, and differing understandings of reality.